People of eBay

https://www.ebay.com/itm/255400416076

This is very confusing. Picture shows thirteen volumes. Info says eight volumes. Condition notes from the seller seems to imply a single book.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/323779252140

This is starting to sound like a broken record but for Coke’s sake at least use your one photo for the front side. We can’t see Coca Cola anywhere on the backside of this ruler. In addition, showing the front allows us to see how long the ruler actually is. Frankenstein’s monster is very unhappy with this listing.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/113706956678

This is really strong you tried vibes. Honestly we can’t tell if this is even the pin itself or a bad photo of the pin. And again the seller failed to take any other pictures. At this point a flip phone could take a better photo.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/325681277989

A misspelling like that might not be so grisly if only they had added “bear” itself to the title. Much like the previous post they chose to not utilize the full character limit that eBay allows.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/362124116819

Why use all eighty characters when nine gets the job done? The seller should have just ran the two words together and saved another whole character.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/185220990523

It might very well be a nice keychain but we can’t tell. This seller also chose to not utilize the other twenty-three photo slots.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/174760847089

This isn’t buried deep in the listing. It’s the very first picture. Too bad eBay doesn’t allow or supply a crop tool. It’s very unfortunate. Also, rocmariherna, judging by the condition of your jeans, you are one photo away from split pants or in your own words “breakers”. And that is the kind of thing you sell on other platforms.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/295580049923

Complete apparently means half of this is missing. This toy is missing half of its tentacles yet was listed as “complete”. On the online Merriam-Webster dictionary this is the first result when you type in complete: “having all necessary parts”.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/165975725049

It’s a stripped camera. It’s missing the back cover and the wrap around piece. Even if it was fully complete and working it would be overpriced by more than one hundred dollars.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/224730568306

Either this is “working tested” or it “is not tested and is being sold for parts or repair”. Kind of a big difference there. If we had to guess we would assume this is the product of a bad sell similar click. Proof reading doesn’t hurt.